In fiscal year 2015 and subsequent fiscal years, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report, on each major warhead refurbishment program that reaches the Phase 6.3 milestone, that provides an analysis of alternatives. Such report shall include—
a full description of alternatives considered prior to the award of Phase 6.3;
a comparison of the costs and benefits of each of those alternatives, to include an analysis of trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance objectives against each alternative considered;
identification of the cost and risk of critical technology elements associated with each alternative, including technology maturity, integration risk, manufacturing feasibility, and demonstration needs;
identification of the cost and risk of additional capital asset and infrastructure capabilities required to support production and certification of each alternative;
a comparative analysis of the risks, costs, and scheduling needs for any military requirement intended to enhance warhead safety, security, or maintainability, including any requirement to consolidate and/or integrate warhead systems or mods as compared to at least one other feasible refurbishment alternative the Nuclear Weapons Council considers appropriate; and
a life-cycle cost estimate for the alternative selected that details the overall cost, scope, and schedule planning assumptions.
Pub. L. 119–60, div. C, title XXXI, § 3111(a)139 Stat. 1352(Added , , .)
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 104170A Stat. 382Pub. L. 85–861, § 33(a)(31)Pub. L. 85–861, § 36B(17)72 Stat. 1571A prior section 6115, , , prescribed a time limit for filing claims for drill pay and for the uniform gratuity. Section was also amended by , which amended catchline by substituting “uniform gratuity” for “unform gratuity”, prior to repeal by , , .
section 2523c of Title 50Pub. L. 119–60, § 3111(b)(3)Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in , War and National Defense, prior to repeal by .