An owner of property that is confiscated under any provision of law relating to the confiscation of assets of suspected international terrorists, may contest that confiscation by filing a claim in the manner set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims), and asserting as an affirmative defense that—
(1)
the property is not subject to confiscation under such provision of law; or
In considering a claim filed under this section, a court may admit evidence that is otherwise inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence, if the court determines that the evidence is reliable, and that compliance with the Federal Rules of Evidence may jeopardize the national security interests of the United States.
(c)
Clarifications.—
(1)
Protection of rights .—
section 983(i) of title 18The exclusion of certain provisions of Federal law from the definition of the term “civil forfeiture statute” in , United States Code, shall not be construed to deny an owner of property the right to contest the confiscation of assets of suspected international terrorists under—
(A)
subsection (a) of this section;
(B)
the Constitution; or
(C)
subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Administrative Procedure Act”).
(2)
Savings clause .—
section 983 of title 18Nothing in this section shall limit or otherwise affect any other remedies that may be available to an owner of property under , United States Code, or any other provision of law.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. The Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, which are set out as part of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, were renamed the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.
The Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.