Definitions
Administering authority
section 1677(1) of this titleThe term “administering authority” has the meaning given that term in .
Commissioner
The term “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Covered merchandise
Enter; entry
The terms “enter” and “entry” refer to the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of merchandise into the customs territory of the United States.
Evasion
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term “evasion” refers to entering covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States by means of any document or electronically transmitted data or information, written or oral statement, or act that is material and false, or any omission that is material, and that results in any cash deposit or other security or any amount of applicable antidumping or countervailing duties being reduced or not being applied with respect to the merchandise.
Exception for clerical error
In general
Patterns of negligent conduct
If the Commissioner determines that a person has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States by means of a clerical error referred to in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (i) and that the clerical error is part of a pattern of negligent conduct on the part of that person, the Commissioner may determine, notwithstanding clause (i), that the person has entered such covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion.
Electronic repetition of errors
For purposes of clause (ii), the mere nonintentional repetition by an electronic system of an initial clerical error does not constitute a pattern of negligent conduct.
Rule of construction
A determination by the Commissioner that a person has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States by means of a clerical error referred to in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (i) rather than through evasion shall not be construed to excuse that person from the payment of any duties applicable to the merchandise.
Interested party
In general
Domestic like product
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “domestic like product” means a product that is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, covered merchandise.
Investigations
In general
Not later than 15 business days after receiving an allegation described in paragraph (2) or a referral described in paragraph (3), the Commissioner shall initiate an investigation if the Commissioner determines that the information provided in the allegation or the referral, as the case may be, reasonably suggests that covered merchandise has been entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion.
Allegation described
Referral described
A referral described in this paragraph is information submitted to the Commissioner by any other Federal agency, including the Department of Commerce or the United States International Trade Commission, that reasonably suggests that a person has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion.
Consideration by administering authority
In general
Determination; transmission to Commissioner
After receiving a referral under subparagraph (A)(i) with respect to merchandise, the administering authority shall determine whether the merchandise is covered merchandise and promptly transmit that determination to the Commissioner.
Stay of deadlines
The period required for any referral and determination under this paragraph shall not be counted in calculating any deadline under this section.
Rule of construction
section 1516a(a)(2) of this titleNothing in this paragraph shall be construed to affect the authority of an interested party to commence an action in the United States Court of International Trade under with respect to a determination of the administering authority under this paragraph.
Consolidation of allegations and referrals
In general
The Commissioner may consolidate multiple allegations described in paragraph (2) and referrals described in paragraph (3) into a single investigation if the Commissioner determines it is appropriate to do so.
Effect on timing requirements
If the Commissioner consolidates multiple allegations or referrals into a single investigation under subparagraph (A), the date on which the Commissioner receives the first such allegation or referral shall be used for purposes of the requirement under paragraph (1) with respect to the timing of the initiation of the investigation.
Information-sharing to protect health and safety
If, during the course of conducting an investigation under paragraph (1) with respect to covered merchandise, the Commissioner has reason to suspect that such covered merchandise may pose a health or safety risk to consumers, the Commissioner shall provide, as appropriate, information to the appropriate Federal agencies for purposes of mitigating the risk.
Technical assistance and advice
In general
Upon request, the Commissioner shall provide technical assistance and advice to eligible small businesses to enable such businesses to prepare and submit allegations described in paragraph (2), except that the Commissioner may deny technical assistance if the Commissioner concludes that the allegation, if submitted, would not lead to the initiation of an investigation under this subsection or any other action to address the allegation.
Eligible small business defined
In general
In this paragraph, the term “eligible small business” means any business concern that the Commissioner determines, due to its small size, has neither adequate internal resources nor the financial ability to obtain qualified outside assistance in preparing and filing allegations described in paragraph (2).
Non-reviewability
The determination of the Commissioner regarding whether a business concern is an eligible small business for purposes of this paragraph is not reviewable by any other agency or by any court.
Determinations
Determination of evasion
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), not later than 300 calendar days after the date on which the Commissioner initiates an investigation under subsection (b) with respect to covered merchandise, the Commissioner shall make a determination, based on substantial evidence, with respect to whether such covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion.
Additional time
Authority to collect and verify additional information
Adverse inference
In general
If the Commissioner finds that a party or person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (2)(A) has failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of the party or person’s ability to comply with a request for information, the Commissioner may, in making a determination under paragraph (1), use an inference that is adverse to the interests of that party or person in selecting from among the facts otherwise available to make the determination.
Application
An inference described in subparagraph (A) may be used under that subparagraph with respect to a person described in clause (ii) or (iii) of paragraph (2)(A) without regard to whether another person involved in the same transaction or transactions under examination has provided the information sought by the Commissioner, such as import or export documentation.
Adverse inference described
Notification
Effect of determinations
In general
Cooperation of administering authority
In general
Upon receiving a notification from the Commissioner under paragraph (1)(C), the administering authority shall promptly provide to the Commissioner the applicable cash deposit rates and antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rates and any necessary liquidation instructions.
Special rule for cases in which the producer or exporter is unknown
section 1673e of this titlesection 1675 of this titleIf the Commissioner and the administering authority are unable to determine the producer or exporter of the merchandise with respect to which a notification is made under paragraph (1)(C), the administering authority shall identify, as the applicable cash deposit rate or antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rate, the cash deposit or duty (as the case may be) in the highest amount applicable to any producer or exporter, including the “all-others” rate of the merchandise subject to an antidumping order or countervailing duty order under or 1671e of this title, respectively, or a finding issued under the Antidumping Act, 1921, or any administrative review conducted under .
Interim measures
Administrative review
In general
Not later than 30 business days after the Commissioner makes a determination under subsection (c) with respect to whether covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion, a person determined to have entered such covered merchandise through evasion or an interested party that filed an allegation under paragraph (2) of subsection (b) that resulted in the initiation of an investigation under paragraph (1) of that subsection with respect to such covered merchandise may file an appeal with the Commissioner for de novo review of the determination.
Timeline for review
Not later than 60 business days after an appeal of a determination is filed under paragraph (1), the Commissioner shall complete the review of the determination.
Judicial review
In general
Not later than 30 business days after the Commissioner completes a review under subsection (f) of a determination under subsection (c) with respect to whether covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion, a person determined to have entered such covered merchandise through evasion or an interested party that filed an allegation under paragraph (2) of subsection (b) that resulted in the initiation of an investigation under paragraph (1) of that subsection with respect to such covered merchandise may seek judicial review of the determination under subsection (c) and the review under subsection (f) in the United States Court of International Trade to determine whether the determination and review is conducted in accordance with subsections (c) and (f).
Standard of review
Rule of construction
Nothing in this subsection shall affect the availability of judicial review to an interested party under any other provision of law.
Rule of construction with respect to other civil and criminal proceedings and investigations
No determination under subsection (c), review under subsection (f), or action taken by the Commissioner pursuant to this section shall preclude any individual or entity from proceeding, or otherwise affect or limit the authority of any individual or entity to proceed, with any civil, criminal, or administrative investigation or proceeding pursuant to any other provision of Federal or State law, including sections 1592 of this title and 1595a of this title.
June 17, 1930, ch. 497Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, § 421(a)130 Stat. 161(, title IV, § 517, as added , , .)
Editorial Notes
References in Text
act May 27, 1921, ch. 14, title II42 Stat. 11Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 106(a)93 Stat. 193The Antidumping Act, 1921, referred to in subsec. (d)(2)(B), is , , which was classified generally to sections 160 to 171 of this title, and was repealed by , , .
Prior Provisions
act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 51746 Stat. 737act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, § 3962 Stat. 992section 2641 of Title 28A prior section 1517, , , related to frivolous protest or appeal, prior to repeal by , , eff. . See , Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, § 421(c)130 Stat. 168
Regulations
Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, § 421(d)130 Stat. 169