Secondary treatment
In general
Additional authority
Subject to the results of the comprehensive plan developed under subsection (b) revealing a need for additional secondary treatment capacity in the San Diego-Tijuana border region and recommending the provision of such capacity in Mexico, the Commission may provide not more than an additional 25 mgd of secondary treatment capacity in Mexico for treatment described in paragraph (1).
Comprehensive plan
Contract
In general
Notwithstanding any provision of Federal procurement law, the Commission may enter into a multiyear fee-for-services contract with the owner of a Mexican facility in order to carry out the secondary treatment requirements of subsection (a) and make payments under such contract, subject to the availability of appropriations and subject to the terms of paragraph (2).
Terms
Implementation
In general
The Inspector General of the Department of State shall monitor the implementation of any contract entered into under this section and evaluate the extent to which the owner of the Mexican facility has met the terms of this section and fulfilled the terms of the contract.
Report
The Inspector General shall transmit to Congress a report containing the evaluation under paragraph (1) not later than 2 years after the execution of any contract with the owner of the Mexican facility under this section, 3 years thereafter, and periodically after the second report under this paragraph.
Pub. L. 106–457, title VIII, § 804114 Stat. 1978Pub. L. 108–425, § 1118 Stat. 2420(, , ; , , .)
Editorial Notes
References in Text
section 510(b)(2) of Pub. L. 100–4101 Stat. 81Section 510(b)(2) of the Water Quality Act of 1987, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is , title V, , , which is not classified to the Code.
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3)118 Stat. 2420Subparagraph (N) of subsec. (c)(2) of this section, referred to in subsec. (c)(2)(Q), was redesignated as subparagraph (P) by , , .
Codification
41 U.S.C. 251Pub. L. 111–350, § 6(c)124 Stat. 3854In subsec. (c)(2)(N), “division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41” substituted for “title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 ( et seq.)” on authority of , , , which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.
Amendments
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(a)2004—Subsec. (a)(1). , substituted “Pursuant to Treaty Minute 311 to the Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, dated ,” for “Subject to the negotiation and conclusion of a new Treaty Minute or the amendment of Treaty Minute 283 under section 1005 of this Act,”.
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(1)Subsec. (c)(1). , added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: “Subject to the availability of appropriations to carry out this subsection and notwithstanding any provision of Federal procurement law, upon conclusion of a new Treaty Minute or the amendment of Treaty Minute 283 under section 5, the Commission may enter into a fee-for-services contract with the owner of a Mexican facility in order to carry out the secondary treatment requirements of subsection (a) of this section and make payments under such contract.”
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(2)Subsec. (c)(2)(I). , substituted “, including costs associated with the purchase of any insurance or other financial instrument under subparagraph (K). Costs associated with the purchase of such insurance or other financial instrument may be amortized over the term of the contract.” for “, with such annual payment to maintain the owner’s 20 percent equity position throughout the term of the contract.”
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3)Subsec. (c)(2)(J), (K). , added subpars. (J) and (K). Former subpars. (J) and (K) redesignated (L) and (M), respectively.
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(4)Subsec. (c)(2)(L), (M). , added subpars. (L) and (M) and struck out former subpars. (L) and (M) which read as follows:
“(L) Provision for the transfer of ownership of the Mexican facility to the United States, and provision for a cancellation fee by the United States to the owner of the Mexican facility, if the Commission fails to perform its obligations under the contract. The cancellation fee shall be in amounts declining over the term of the contract anticipated to be sufficient to repay construction debt and other amounts due to the owner that remain unamortized due to early termination of the contract.
“(M) Provision for the transfer of ownership of the Mexican facility to the United States, without a cancellation fee, if the owner of the Mexican facility fails to perform the obligations of the owner under the contract.”
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3), redesignated subpars. (J) and (K) as (L) and (M), respectively. Former subpars. (L) and (M) redesignated (N) and (O), respectively.
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3)Subsec. (c)(2)(N). , (5), redesignated subpar. (L) as (N) and inserted “under applicable law” after “competitive procedures”. Former subpar. (N) redesignated (P).
Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3)Subsec. (c)(2)(O) to (R). , redesignated subpars. (M) to (P) as (O) to (R), respectively.