25 U.S.C. § 372–1 | Repealed. Pub. L. 101–301, § 12(a), May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 211

Pub. L. 90–28, title IJune 24, 196781 Stat. 69June 24, 1967Section, , , , provided that, on and after , hearing officers appointed for Indian probate work did not have to be appointed pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, as amended. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

May 31, 1966Pub. L. 89–435, title I 80 Stat. 181, , .

June 28, 1965Pub. L. 89–52, title I 79 Stat. 185, , .

July 7, 1964Pub. L. 88–356, title I 78 Stat. 284, , .

July 26, 1963Pub. L. 88–79, title I 77 Stat. 107, , .

Aug. 9, 1962Pub. L. 87–578, title I 76 Stat. 345, , .

Aug. 3, 1961Pub. L. 87–122, title I 75 Stat. 256, , .

May 13, 1960Pub. L. 86–455, title I 74 Stat. 104, , .

June 23, 1959Pub. L. 86–60, title I 73 Stat. 92, , .

June 4, 1958Pub. L. 85–439, title I 72 Stat. 155, , .

July 1, 1957Pub. L. 85–77, title I 71 Stat. 257, , .

June 13, 1956, ch. 380 70 Stat. 257, title I, .

June 16, 1955, ch. 147 69 Stat. 141, title I, .

Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 935 68 Stat. 813, Ch. VII, .

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Savings Provision

Pub. L. 101–301, § 12(b)May 24, 1990104 Stat. 211

25 U.S.C. 372–1 section 3105 of title 5“Hearing officers heretofore appointed to preside over Indian probate proceedings pursuant to the proviso repealed by subsection (a) [], having met the qualifications required for appointment pursuant to , United States Code, shall be deemed to have been appointed pursuant to that section.”

, , , provided that: