Public Law 119-83 (04/13/2026)

29 U.S.C. § 258

Reliance on past administrative rulings, etc.

29 U.S.C. 2011

1 See References in Text note below.
In any action or proceeding commenced prior to or on or after based on any act or omission prior to , no employer shall be subject to any liability or punishment for or on account of the failure of the employer to pay minimum wages or overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [ et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act, if he pleads and proves that the act or omission complained of was in good faith in conformity with and in reliance on any administrative regulation, order, ruling, approval, or interpretation, of any agency of the United States, or any administrative practice or enforcement policy of any such agency with respect to the class of employers to which he belonged. Such a defense, if established, shall be a bar to the action or proceeding, notwithstanding that after such act or omission, such administrative regulation, order, ruling, approval, interpretation, practice, or enforcement policy is modified or rescinded or is determined by judicial authority to be invalid or of no legal effect.

May 14, 1947, ch. 52, § 9 61 Stat. 88 (, .)

Editorial Notes

References in Text

act June 25, 1938, ch. 676 52 Stat. 1060 section 201 of this titleThe Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, referred to in text, is , , which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§ 201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see and Tables.

section 262 of this titleThe Walsh-Healey and Bacon-Davis Acts, referred to in text, are defined for purposes of this chapter in .