§1862s. Reaffirmation of merit-based peer review
(a) Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that-
(1) sustained, predictable Federal funding of basic research is essential to United States leadership in science and technology;
(2) the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts criteria are appropriate for evaluating grant proposals, as concluded by the 2011 National Science Board Task Force on Merit Review;
(3) evaluating proposals on the basis of the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts criteria should be used to assure that the Foundation's activities are in the national interest as these reviews can affirm that-
(A) the proposals funded by the Foundation are of high quality and advance scientific knowledge; and
(B) the Foundation's grants address societal needs through basic research findings or through related activities; and
(4) as evidenced by the Foundation's contributions to scientific advancement, economic growth, human health, and national security, its peer review and merit review processes have identified and funded scientifically and societally relevant basic research and should be preserved.
(b) Merit review criteria
The Foundation shall maintain the intellectual merit and broader impacts criteria, among other specific criteria as appropriate, as the basis for evaluating grant proposals in the merit review process.
(c) Updates
If after January 6, 2017, a change is made to the merit-review process, the Director shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress not later than 30 days after the date of the change.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Definitions
"(1)
"(2)
"(3)
"(4)
"(5)
"(6)
"(7)