June 25, 1948, ch. 64662 Stat. 944May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 9063 Stat. 102(, ; , .)
Historical and Revision Notes
Act1948
Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 23136 Stat. 1156Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 342, 376, 377 (, §§ 234, 261, 262, , 1162).
Section consolidates sections 342, 376, and 377 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with necessary changes in phraseology.
Such section 342 provided:
“The Supreme Court shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed under the authority of the United States, or to persons holding office under the authority of the United States, where a State, or an ambassador, or other public minister, or a consul, or vice consul is a party.”
Such section 376 provided:
“Writs of ne exeat may be granted by any justice of the Supreme Court, in cases where they might be granted by the Supreme Court; and by any district judge, in cases where they might be granted by the district court of which he is a judge. But no writ of ne exeat shall be granted unless a suit in equity is commenced, and satisfactory proof is made to the court or judge granting the same that the defendant designs quickly to depart from the United States.”
Such section 377 provided:
“The Supreme Court and the district courts shall have power to issue writs of scire facias. The Supreme Court, the circuit courts of appeals, and the district courts shall have power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
section 342 of title 28The special provisions of , U.S.C., 1940 ed., with reference to writs of prohibition and mandamus, admiralty courts and other courts and officers of the United States were omitted as unnecessary in view of the revised section.
The revised section extends the power to issue writs in aid of jurisdiction, to all courts established by Act of Congress, thus making explicit the right to exercise powers implied from the creation of such courts.
section 376 of title 28The provisions of , U.S.C., 1940 ed., with respect to the powers of a justice or judge in issuing writs of ne exeat were changed and made the basis of subsection (b) of the revised section but the conditions and limitations on the writ of ne exeat were omitted as merely confirmatory of well-settled principles of law.
section 377 of title 28U.S. Alkali Export Assn. v. U.SDe Beers Consol. Mines v. U.SThe provision in , U.S.C., 1940 ed., authorizing issuance of writs of scire facias, was omitted in view of rule 81(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abolishing such writ. The revised section is expressive of the construction recently placed upon such section by the Supreme Court in ., 65 S.Ct. 1120, 325 U.S. 196, 89 L.Ed. 1554, and ., 65 S.Ct. 1130, 325 U.S. 212, 89 L.Ed. 1566.
Act1949
section 1651 of title 28This section corrects a grammatical error in subsection (a) of , U.S.C.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1949—Subsec. (a). Act , inserted “and” after “jurisdictions”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Writ of Error
Act Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, § 245 Stat. 54Apr. 26, 1928, ch. 44045 Stat. 466June 25, 1948, ch. 646, § 2362 Stat. 990